<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059</id><updated>2012-02-06T19:53:37.843-08:00</updated><category term='international family law'/><category term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category term='Egypt'/><category term='child support'/><category term='wedding'/><category term='immigration'/><category term='alternate dispute resolution'/><category term='Defense of Marriage'/><category term='same-sex marriage'/><category term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category term='prenuptial agreement'/><category term='paternity'/><category term='Los Angeles family law'/><category term='sports'/><category term='international child custody'/><category term='Sharia'/><category term='MLB'/><category term='domestic partnership'/><category term='custody and religion'/><category term='prenup'/><category term='Porsche'/><category term='baseball'/><category term='therapy'/><category term='White House'/><category term='arbitration'/><category term='Gould-Saltman'/><category term='California child custody'/><category term='medical marijuana'/><category term='octuplets'/><category term='divorce'/><category term='economy'/><category term='separation'/><category term='California marriage'/><category term='divorce insurance'/><category term='psychotherapy'/><category term='child custody'/><category term='Hague Convention'/><category term='California state budget'/><category term='marijuana'/><category term='psychologists'/><category term='religious liberty'/><category term='communtiy property'/><category term='Washington D.C.'/><category term='gay marriage'/><category term='court budget'/><category term='Vermont'/><category term='civil union'/><category term='international divorce'/><category term='retirement'/><category term='Social Security'/><category term='Iowa'/><category term='child care'/><category term='marriage'/><category term='interstate divorce'/><category term='assisted reproduction'/><category term='New York divorce'/><category term='divorce lawyer'/><category term='courts'/><category term='interstate child custody'/><category term='pre-nuptial'/><category term='McCourt'/><category term='murder'/><category term='Obama'/><category term='no-fault divorce'/><category term='family law'/><category term='Superlawyers'/><category term='children and law'/><category term='Islam'/><category term='name changes'/><category term='children'/><category term='counseling'/><category term='drug use'/><category term='recession'/><category term='divorce settlement'/><category term='spousal support'/><category term='domestic violence'/><category term='pre-marital'/><category term='vaccination'/><category term='marriage insurance'/><category term='parental alienation'/><category term='international child abduction'/><category term='parenting'/><category term='California divorce'/><category term='celebrity divorce'/><category term='Supreme Court'/><category term='child abuse'/><category term='parents'/><category term='adultery'/><category term='fault'/><category term='Einstein'/><category term='Constitutional rights'/><category term='domestic abuse'/><category term='California family law'/><category term='religion'/><category term='alimony'/><category term='illegal alien'/><category term='California prenuptial'/><title type='text'>Family Law Guy</title><subtitle type='html'>California family law news, views, and ruminations

by Richard Gould-Saltman</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>67</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4504939251262777483</id><published>2012-02-06T16:21:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-06T16:21:57.995-08:00</updated><title type='text'>You Have A LOT of Questions!</title><summary type='text'>That little "AVVO" badge there on the right side reflects that from time to time, over the last several years, I've answered questions posted by members of the public about family law issues.  Somewhere along the line, I've apparently answered more than 2,500 of those questions.  (That's two and a half thousand.) For free.  Even figuring three minutes per question, that's roughly a hundred and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2012/02/you-have-lot-of-questions.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4504939251262777483'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4504939251262777483'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2012/02/you-have-lot-of-questions.html' title='You Have A LOT of Questions!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-879052821077307731</id><published>2012-01-19T12:58:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-19T13:09:12.940-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Constitutional rights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='recession'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='courts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='court budget'/><title type='text'>All of You:  Time to Pester Your Elected Representatives</title><summary type='text'>Those of you who've followed this blog for more than a post or two have long since tired of my, and others' yelling about the fact that trial courts, and particularly family law trial courts, have been getting a raw deal in terms of funding.  Now, it's official.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2012/01/all-of-you-time-to-pester-your-elected.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/879052821077307731'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/879052821077307731'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2012/01/all-of-you-time-to-pester-your-elected.html' title='All of You:  Time to Pester Your Elected Representatives'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-7829586302849194725</id><published>2011-12-20T13:41:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-20T13:45:39.827-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Superlawyers'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman'/><title type='text'>I'll have some year-end thoughts</title><summary type='text'>...after a somewhat more exciting year than I really needed... watch this space....</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/12/superlawyer-again-in-2012.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7829586302849194725'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7829586302849194725'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/12/superlawyer-again-in-2012.html' title='I&apos;ll have some year-end thoughts'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8662304453360725280</id><published>2011-11-17T17:10:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-17T17:10:35.410-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><title type='text'>Back to Hollywood</title><summary type='text'>Kim K's marriage is broken, after seventy-two days; presumably she listened to her own advice on the subject of prenuptial agreements.
</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/11/back-to-hollywood.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8662304453360725280'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8662304453360725280'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/11/back-to-hollywood.html' title='Back to Hollywood'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3238216015982533895</id><published>2011-10-17T11:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-17T11:21:25.359-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Constitutional rights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='same-sex marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><title type='text'>An Ad Hoc Fix of the Interstate Same-Sex Divorce Problem</title><summary type='text'>has now been signed into law.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/10/ad-hoc-fix-of-interstate-same-sex.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3238216015982533895'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3238216015982533895'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/10/ad-hoc-fix-of-interstate-same-sex.html' title='An Ad Hoc Fix of the Interstate Same-Sex Divorce Problem'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1755982430202745037</id><published>2011-10-12T12:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-12T12:53:50.980-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman'/><title type='text'>Only Tangentially About Family Law: In Memory</title><summary type='text'>ESG: 1926-2011

When I graduated , in the words of the old joke, "I was surprised how much the old man had learned".
When I became a father, I understood some of what I'd previously dismissed as idiosyncrasy.
I did not understand, until recently, that sometimes there is as much  heroism in "I will continue and endure" as there is in battle.

Time to rest, Pop.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/10/only-tangentially-about-family-law-in.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1755982430202745037'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1755982430202745037'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/10/only-tangentially-about-family-law-in.html' title='Only Tangentially About Family Law: In Memory'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4912099572456965794</id><published>2011-07-21T11:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-07-21T11:50:09.405-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Parenting, Custody and Realistic Risk Assessment</title><summary type='text'>Which is more risky for a nine-year old: letting the child wait alone at  a bus stop for ten minutes, in mid-day, or letting the same child ride a  bicycle for a half hour near his house?  How about letting the same  child visit a friend who has a swimming pool? A friend whose parent owns  firearms and keeps them in the house? (See Dubner and Levitt's  Freakonomics for that dyad.)  Which are most</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/07/parenting-custody-and-realistic-risk.html#comment-form' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4912099572456965794'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4912099572456965794'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/07/parenting-custody-and-realistic-risk.html' title='Parenting, Custody and Realistic Risk Assessment'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1605681555460687734</id><published>2011-07-13T15:43:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2011-09-06T17:10:42.008-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Zero to Three: Parenting Issues and Parenting Plans For Young Children   My ABA Teleseminar materials for 7/21/11 with Aaron Robb</title><summary type='text'>Zero to Three: Parenting Issues and Parenting Plans For Young Children
 We open with three disclaimers:
We will not address the evidentiary adequacy of child custody evaluations, research bearing on custody issues performed by mental health professionals, or the adequacy of the social science underlying them.[1]

We are also will not address, in other than a general way, the efficacy of custody/</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/07/my-aba-teleseminar-materials-for-72111.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1605681555460687734'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1605681555460687734'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/07/my-aba-teleseminar-materials-for-72111.html' title='Zero to Three: Parenting Issues and Parenting Plans For Young Children   My ABA Teleseminar materials for 7/21/11 with Aaron Robb'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5744280875501316481</id><published>2011-06-22T13:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-22T13:22:00.139-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>Back In The Saddle Again</title><summary type='text'>After a hiatus, I'm accumulated enough stuff so that I feel obliged to get some posts up.         Within a week after the McCourts thought they'd worked an over-all settlement, MLB has said "Not so fast..."         ...and this just in:          "Khloe Kardashian thinks 'everybody needs a prenup.' In an interview ...  ... the 26-year-old defended her recently engaged sister Kim's shocking </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/06/back-in-saddle-again.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5744280875501316481'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5744280875501316481'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/06/back-in-saddle-again.html' title='Back In The Saddle Again'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6271562174325836808</id><published>2011-03-04T11:08:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-05-13T16:10:20.151-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parental alienation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>California Child Custody: What's Going On? Is It Broken?  How?</title><summary type='text'>"Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear. "*Last week, a Northern California newspaper published an extended piece, asserting, yet again, that the family law system is (quoting the cover headline) "helping pedophiles, batterers get childcustody".  While buried in the body of the piece was an acknowledgment that " it is impossible to say how common such cases are", that isn't </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/03/california-child-custody-whats-going-on.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6271562174325836808'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6271562174325836808'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/03/california-child-custody-whats-going-on.html' title='California Child Custody: What&apos;s Going On? Is It Broken?  How?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-704930983035010593</id><published>2011-01-31T15:08:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-31T15:35:53.676-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='custody and religion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><title type='text'>Family Law and Religion:  Religious Divorce</title><summary type='text'>It's not every day that someone's divorce results in protests to the staff of the House Ways and Means Committee.    Maryland, unlike New York, apparently does not have a legal mechanism by which recalcitrant divorcing husbands can be directly coerced into granting their observant ex-wives religious divorces, so it appears the judge may have fashioned his own remedy.  While I have some serious </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/01/family-law-and-religion-religious.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/704930983035010593'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/704930983035010593'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/01/family-law-and-religion-religious.html' title='Family Law and Religion:  Religious Divorce'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3477897944841232880</id><published>2011-01-12T14:10:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-01-31T15:02:56.754-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='vaccination'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><title type='text'>Child Custody and Religion:  The Hits Keep Coming, Folks!</title><summary type='text'>An interesting case about medical decisions in child custody cases, with a religious issue overlaid on top of it.    A judge, presented with giving either Dad, (who wanted child vaccinated) or Mom (who wanted the child NOT vaccinated, for ostensibly religious reasons) the decision-making authority to over-ride the other parent's preference, chooses Dad's view. Query whether the outcome would have</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/01/child-custody-and-religion-hits-keep.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3477897944841232880'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3477897944841232880'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2011/01/child-custody-and-religion-hits-keep.html' title='Child Custody and Religion:  The Hits Keep Coming, Folks!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8986040993513852966</id><published>2010-12-20T16:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-03-07T10:22:21.848-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Defense of Marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domestic partnership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='civil union'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>French Civil Unions: "Marriage Lite"?</title><summary type='text'>There's a reported substantial upswing,  in France, of young opposite-sex couples electing to contract "civil unions" instead of marrying.   The French 1999 "pacte civil de solidarité"  ("civil union") statute was apparently originally enacted, (as with the "civil union" and "domestic partnership" laws of several American states), as a"sort-of-marriage" for same-sex couples, but, as the New York </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/12/french-civil-unions-marriage-lite.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8986040993513852966'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8986040993513852966'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/12/french-civil-unions-marriage-lite.html' title='French Civil Unions: &quot;Marriage Lite&quot;?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4262278958763732280</id><published>2010-10-20T08:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-14T18:11:44.092-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>Pre-Nups Valid in the U.K.</title><summary type='text'>Maybe, says the U.K.'s  Supreme Court.  Thanks and a big 'ol Texas hat tip to Randy Kessler for the pointer.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/10/pre-nups-valid-in-uk.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4262278958763732280'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4262278958763732280'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/10/pre-nups-valid-in-uk.html' title='Pre-Nups Valid in the U.K.'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-7838814211028548450</id><published>2010-10-05T17:54:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-22T10:15:31.722-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Constitutional rights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='custody and religion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religion'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Another Child Custody and Religion Case</title><summary type='text'>...in which nobody seemed to raise the Constitutional issues.  This time, it's Georgia; by agreement, Mom was to have the authority to make decisions about child's religious training and upbringing.  Mom wanted to give child Jewish religious training and practice, and Dad had, it appears, originally agreed.  Then, it appears, Dad changed his mind, and (as is sometimes the case in these sorts of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/10/another-child-custody-and-religion-case.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7838814211028548450'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7838814211028548450'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/10/another-child-custody-and-religion-case.html' title='Another Child Custody and Religion Case'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-777691309035759681</id><published>2010-09-24T16:32:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-12-22T10:18:23.879-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>Are You and Your Fiancee Working From The Same Blueprint?  The Pre-Nup Conversation as Marriage Insurance</title><summary type='text'>Over at Gitlin Law Blog, Illinois family law attorney Joe Gitlin muses that marriages break down when (to use a metaphor which dates both him and me) the spouses aren't "building from the same blueprint".This is consistent with my take: the crux of the decision to divorce isn't usually specifically about money, or sex, or intimacy, it's that moment, a year, a decade, four decades into the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/09/are-you-and-your-fiance-working-from.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/777691309035759681'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/777691309035759681'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/09/are-you-and-your-fiance-working-from.html' title='Are You and Your Fiancee Working From The Same Blueprint?  The Pre-Nup Conversation as Marriage Insurance'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3904645662025833071</id><published>2010-09-15T12:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-09-15T13:12:09.431-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='medical marijuana'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='drug use'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marijuana'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Parents and Pot:  Michigan</title><summary type='text'>It seems that under Michigan's Medical Marijuana Act,  a parent may not be denied custody or visitation of a minor for acting  in accordance with the act [i.e., possessing pot with a properly issued "registry identification card"] unless his or her behavior is such that it  creates an "unreasonable danger to the minor which can be clearly  articulated and substantiated".  The Michigan Court of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/09/parents-and-pot-michigan.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3904645662025833071'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3904645662025833071'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/09/parents-and-pot-michigan.html' title='Parents and Pot:  Michigan'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1837843575551630021</id><published>2010-08-01T14:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-08-01T14:54:32.350-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='separation'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Separated, But Never Divorced?</title><summary type='text'>The New York Times on some of the reasons that some folks (including, apparently, Warren Buffet) continue in marital limbo, for years, and in some cases, decades.  The record, in my own practice, was a client who had cohabited with his new spouse just long enough to conceive, and for her to give birth to, a child; now that their son was finally reaching adulthood, they thought it would be a good </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/08/separated-but-never-divorced.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1837843575551630021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1837843575551630021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/08/separated-but-never-divorced.html' title='Separated, But Never Divorced?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2709294310408388082</id><published>2010-07-04T14:07:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-11-24T08:23:13.105-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>Prenups On The Way Up For Boomers</title><summary type='text'>...or so says the Wall Street Journal.   Possible explanations (none exclusive, and none clearly verifiable) include:that boomers divorce more frequently, and live longer, than their parents, and thus have a higher rate of re-marriage; or that our lives are simply overwhelmed by fear of litigation; or that the financial crisis has simply taken some of the romance out of romance.. . . and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/07/prenups-on-way-up-for-boomers.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2709294310408388082'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2709294310408388082'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/07/prenups-on-way-up-for-boomers.html' title='Prenups On The Way Up For Boomers'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4347675405762319143</id><published>2010-07-01T13:00:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-01T13:03:13.826-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><title type='text'>Excitement On The Home Front</title><summary type='text'>Some of you may have noticed a recent subtle change in the blog profile.  Here's why.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/07/excitement-on-home-front.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4347675405762319143'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4347675405762319143'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/07/excitement-on-home-front.html' title='Excitement On The Home Front'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5444704691471521066</id><published>2010-06-30T10:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-01T13:07:02.106-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='counseling'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>On-Line Marital "Tune-Ups"?</title><summary type='text'>Per the New York Times,  a number of efforts are afoot to provide on-line tools for "preventive maintenance and assessment" for married couples.  (Providing relationships with something  between scheduled maintenance/inspection visits by your car dealer, and your annual physical?)Professors from UCLA and University of Miami are soliciting 500 married couples to participate in a study of on-line </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/06/on-line-marital-tune-ups.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5444704691471521066'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5444704691471521066'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/06/on-line-marital-tune-ups.html' title='On-Line Marital &quot;Tune-Ups&quot;?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8294799482273720429</id><published>2010-06-13T22:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-06-15T13:17:59.442-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Custody and Religion Part 4: Something in the Water in Chicago?</title><summary type='text'>I won't really get incensed (pun intended) until I read a clearer and more definitive description of the facts and order in the underlying case, but a recent report suggests that Chicago judges are willing to make intrusive orders not only against divorced parents, but against new step-parents, in regard to issues of religious upbringing, seemingly pretty much ignoring that stuff about "</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/06/custody-and-religion-part-4-something.html#comment-form' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8294799482273720429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8294799482273720429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/06/custody-and-religion-part-4-something.html' title='Custody and Religion Part 4: Something in the Water in Chicago?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3953638857971850637</id><published>2010-05-18T11:31:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-18T12:10:12.878-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Gould-Saltman Law Offices'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><title type='text'>I've Always Wanted to Be A Cover Model!</title><summary type='text'>There we are, on the cover of this month's CEB catalog!</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/ive-always-wanted-to-be-cover-model.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3953638857971850637'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3953638857971850637'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/ive-always-wanted-to-be-cover-model.html' title='I&apos;ve Always Wanted to Be A Cover Model!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_LAeQACTm0LU/S_LlsZeJVhI/AAAAAAAAAAc/K8r87ZmQfYQ/s72-c/ceb+catalog+cover.jpg' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-347547366702605289</id><published>2010-05-18T10:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-06-14T07:54:46.095-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child abduction'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Supreme Court'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Hague Convention'/><title type='text'>Abbott:  Supreme Court Decision on International Child Abduction Issues</title><summary type='text'>The SCOTUS has decided, 6-3, in Abbott v. Abbott,  a lingering issue in international child custody abduction cases.  Only a parent with a "right of custody" can invoke the Hague Convention to compel the return of the child.  Lower Federal courts have disagreed as to whether a parent with only "visitation" rights, but with a "ne exeat" order (forbidding the removal of the child from that country)</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/abbott-supreme-court-decision-on.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/347547366702605289'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/347547366702605289'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/abbott-supreme-court-decision-on.html' title='Abbott:  Supreme Court Decision on International Child Abduction Issues'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8919519526453399745</id><published>2010-05-10T12:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-05-10T12:08:44.509-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce lawyer'/><title type='text'>Divorce, Italian Style?</title><summary type='text'>The New York Times reports Italy's first "divorce trade show".  I guess "Divorce, Italian Style" no longer carries quite the significance it once did.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/divorce-italian-style.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8919519526453399745'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8919519526453399745'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/05/divorce-italian-style.html' title='Divorce, Italian Style?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-9018125159523131539</id><published>2010-04-23T11:08:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-23T11:57:57.664-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Custody and Religion, Part 3</title><summary type='text'>An Illinois trial judge has modified the earlier order noted below and decided that, although Dad in the case appears to have engaged in fairly self-centered and obnoxious behavior in regard to parenting issues, (see pages 7 and 8 of the decision) Dad's taking his daughter to church during his custodial time is within his Constitutional rights, in the absence of some showing of true detriment to </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/04/custody-and-religion-part-3.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/9018125159523131539'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/9018125159523131539'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/04/custody-and-religion-part-3.html' title='Custody and Religion, Part 3'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3136200426845830862</id><published>2010-03-30T11:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-04-05T16:41:00.154-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='alternate dispute resolution'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California state budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Why Do People Divorce, and Should We Make it Harder  To Do?</title><summary type='text'>A family law blogger colleague argues against Maryland’s pending reduction of the minimum waiting period for entry of a divorce judgment.In support of his argument that this is a bad thing, he republishes a study which notes a statistical correlation between a state’s minimum time for completion of divorce proceedings and the divorce rate in the state (and also cites a similar correlation as to </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/03/why-do-people-divorce-and-should-we.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3136200426845830862'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3136200426845830862'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/03/why-do-people-divorce-and-should-we.html' title='Why Do People Divorce, and Should We Make it Harder  To Do?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4730324717253152986</id><published>2010-03-08T07:24:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2010-11-24T08:24:07.296-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage insurance'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>Pre-Nups:  "Not Romantic", but more romantic than divorce!</title><summary type='text'>On the upswing, says USA Today.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/03/pre-nups-not-romantic-but-more-romantic.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4730324717253152986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4730324717253152986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/03/pre-nups-not-romantic-but-more-romantic.html' title='Pre-Nups:  &quot;Not Romantic&quot;, but more romantic than divorce!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5203311050671489029</id><published>2010-02-23T16:06:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-11T15:21:34.527-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Constitutional rights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='arbitration'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='courts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='court budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='alternate dispute resolution'/><title type='text'>Kentucky Nixes Arbitration in Family Law, As, Among Other Things, Classist?</title><summary type='text'>The Kentucky Court of Appeals has held that an agreement to submit all or a portion of a family law dispute to binding arbitration, without independent review by a sitting "real" judge, is an impermissible delegation of the court's power.  Among the more notable comments the court made, however, was the following, made without any citation of further authority:Notwithstanding that the parties </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/02/kentucky-nixes-arbitration-in-family.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5203311050671489029'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5203311050671489029'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/02/kentucky-nixes-arbitration-in-family.html' title='Kentucky Nixes Arbitration in Family Law, As, Among Other Things, Classist?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-7010697395549737303</id><published>2010-02-19T15:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-03-25T10:24:00.865-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Constitutional rights'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='religious liberty'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Custody and Religion, Again.</title><summary type='text'>A Chicago court may be about to jail (link repaired, see also here  and  here ) a law student/parent for taking his child to church in what seems, from the interview he gave, to be a clear and deliberate violation of a court order.  While a California court would clearly not make a similar order, the manner in which the issue arose here raises a couple of interesting questions:To what extent can/</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/02/custody-and-religion-again.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7010697395549737303'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7010697395549737303'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/02/custody-and-religion-again.html' title='Custody and Religion, Again.'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-3409282311487986183</id><published>2010-01-25T14:09:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-01-25T14:13:15.348-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><title type='text'>Now Why Didn't I Think Of That?</title><summary type='text'>A divorce gift registry.    Those Brits are so far ahead of us in handling matters of etiquette.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/01/now-why-didnt-i-think-of-that.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3409282311487986183'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/3409282311487986183'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2010/01/now-why-didnt-i-think-of-that.html' title='Now Why Didn&apos;t I Think Of That?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6437672674963263801</id><published>2009-12-30T11:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-30T12:06:41.586-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child abduction'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>The Year's Most Interesting Custody Cases Wind Up!</title><summary type='text'>Sean Goldman has been returned to the United States, after many months, and many tens of thousands of  dollars, of litigation by his father to get him back from Brazil.  His  Brazilian "step-father"* was able to delay the return to the United States seemingly required by the Hague Convention, and a last-minute review by the Brazilian Supreme Court threatened to delay the final order being carried</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/years-most-interesting-custody-cases.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6437672674963263801'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6437672674963263801'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/years-most-interesting-custody-cases.html' title='The Year&apos;s Most Interesting Custody Cases Wind Up!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-596433842015457098</id><published>2009-12-09T11:18:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T10:56:03.423-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='communtiy property'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Porsche'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Just In Time for The Holidays: When Is That Porsche With The Big Red Bow NOT A Gift?</title><summary type='text'>Ms. Buie was married to Mr. Neighbors.   Ms. Buie had previously sold a piece of real estate, and had some money in the bank, so shortly before Mr. Neighbors' birthday, she allowed him to take $60,000 of that money and buy himself a Porsche.  . . . . . or so he thought.    As a California court has already observed, ". . . divorce unsettles many of the parties' significant plans and assumptions, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/just-in-time-for-holidays-when-is-that.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/596433842015457098'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/596433842015457098'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/just-in-time-for-holidays-when-is-that.html' title='Just In Time for The Holidays: When Is That Porsche With The Big Red Bow NOT A Gift?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8574994100845199599</id><published>2009-12-03T16:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T10:56:47.526-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='retirement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Social Security'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Divorce and Social Security</title><summary type='text'>A quick explanation, from the Wall Street Journal, of divorce and Social Security benefits.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/divorce-and-social-security.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8574994100845199599'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8574994100845199599'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/12/divorce-and-social-security.html' title='Divorce and Social Security'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4333388438110870137</id><published>2009-10-28T10:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T11:03:10.220-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='sports'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='MLB'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='baseball'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='McCourt'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>McCourts: Minding (And Dividing) The Family Store</title><summary type='text'>Jamie McCourt has now filed her action for dissolution, along with a request for somewhere between $300,000 and $500,000 per month in spousal support  (depending on whether she immediately gets back all her perks of being a Dodgers co-owner) and about two and a half million dollars in attorney fees and litigation costs.What's interesting about this case, beyond the usual tabloid stuff, is that it</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/10/mccourts-minding-and-dividing-family.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4333388438110870137'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4333388438110870137'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/10/mccourts-minding-and-dividing-family.html' title='McCourts: Minding (And Dividing) The Family Store'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-628873779096702914</id><published>2009-10-23T16:38:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-23T16:42:56.912-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><title type='text'>Kim Kardashian Agrees With Me: Get a Pre-marital Agreement!</title><summary type='text'>I just couldn't resist writing the headline.  Here's the story.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/10/kim-kardashian-agrees-with-me-get-pre.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/628873779096702914'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/628873779096702914'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/10/kim-kardashian-agrees-with-me-get-pre.html' title='Kim Kardashian Agrees With Me: Get a Pre-marital Agreement!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4823859845554390841</id><published>2009-09-24T10:10:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-24T10:17:09.242-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='interstate divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Surprisingly, Los Angles is NOT the Divorce Capital!</title><summary type='text'>In fact, California's not really in the running.   Looks like Indiana and Florida are the big contenders.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/09/surprisingly-los-angles-is-not-divorce.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4823859845554390841'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4823859845554390841'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/09/surprisingly-los-angles-is-not-divorce.html' title='Surprisingly, Los Angles is NOT the Divorce Capital!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8182632987443745616</id><published>2009-09-20T22:20:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T10:58:01.501-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>How To Maximize Your Parenting In California</title><summary type='text'>My advice on:How To Maximize Your Parenting In California - Avvo.comShared via AddThis</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-to-maximize-your-parenting-in.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8182632987443745616'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8182632987443745616'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/09/how-to-maximize-your-parenting-in.html' title='How To Maximize Your Parenting In California'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2407770354132410382</id><published>2009-08-25T11:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T10:58:58.617-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>We're saying the same thing; we're just saying it differently</title><summary type='text'>My learned colleague Mark Chinn** from Jackson, MS, posted a deliberately provocative title to his blog this week: said Mark: "If you get a prenuptial agreement in the days before the marriage, don’t sign it!"My thought was: "If your fiance hands you a prenuptial agreement at the church door, stop the music, and postpone the wedding! You've just learned something very valuable about your fiance, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/were-saying-same-thing-wee-just-saying.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2407770354132410382'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2407770354132410382'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/were-saying-same-thing-wee-just-saying.html' title='We&apos;re saying the same thing; we&apos;re just saying it differently'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5124035590007572579</id><published>2009-08-25T10:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-25T16:06:35.907-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Islam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sharia'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Teenagers, the State and Religion: do hard cases make bad law?</title><summary type='text'>Rifqa Bary, who's seventeen, ran away from her parents in Columbus, Ohio, and turned up in Orlando, Florida, under the "care"of a pastor whom she met over the internet.  The pastor held a press conference in which Rifqa announced, under the pastor's eye (or more exactly, under his arm)  that she had run away because she had converted to Christianity, and that she was afraid that her Muslim </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/teenagers-state-and-religion-do-hard.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5124035590007572579'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5124035590007572579'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/teenagers-state-and-religion-do-hard.html' title='Teenagers, the State and Religion: do hard cases make bad law?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5004892689654772986</id><published>2009-08-06T11:01:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-06T11:04:26.801-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Divorce Can Make You Sick</title><summary type='text'>This just in:  divorcing is often so stressful that it will make you sick.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/divorce-can-make-you-sick.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5004892689654772986'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5004892689654772986'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/08/divorce-can-make-you-sick.html' title='Divorce Can Make You Sick'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1237147872315610393</id><published>2009-07-07T16:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T16:58:51.344-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>Pre-Nups in Britain?   Maybe so!</title><summary type='text'>It appears that a sea-change in British family law may happening, and that British courts may begin recognizing some pre-marital agreements as valid.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/07/pre-nups-in-britain-maybe-so.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1237147872315610393'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1237147872315610393'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/07/pre-nups-in-britain-maybe-so.html' title='Pre-Nups in Britain?   Maybe so!'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6165831563659011248</id><published>2009-06-26T09:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-26T09:25:44.466-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce lawyer'/><title type='text'>Divorce, Tabloid News, and the First Amendment</title><summary type='text'>The Connecticut Supreme Court has held that once someone with a "celebrity divorce" signs an agreement that gives away the right to blab about the divorce to the media, in exchange for money from her ex, that agreement will be enforced, and isn't an improper violation of the would-be-blabber's First Amendment rights.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/divorce-tabloid-news-and-first.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6165831563659011248'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6165831563659011248'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/divorce-tabloid-news-and-first.html' title='Divorce, Tabloid News, and the First Amendment'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6035036147804859044</id><published>2009-06-17T17:00:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-06T13:00:56.395-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><title type='text'>A Cup of Coffee on the Way, Part 3: Pre-Marital Agreements: Romance-Killer or Marriage Insurance?</title><summary type='text'>Back in February, I started down a path of discussing what we, as a society and as a state, intended when we set up our "family law" and rules, and how, and whether, that should change.  I've been contemplating those issues since then and talking to lots of people, about 'em.One of the issues which has nagged at me is the relative ease with which we as a society let (some) folks undertake the "</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/cup-of-coffee-on-way-part-3-pre-marital.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6035036147804859044'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6035036147804859044'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/cup-of-coffee-on-way-part-3-pre-marital.html' title='A Cup of Coffee on the Way, Part 3: Pre-Marital Agreements: Romance-Killer or Marriage Insurance?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4228670015393076419</id><published>2009-06-02T15:36:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-02T15:42:41.473-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='courts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='therapy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='psychologists'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='psychotherapy'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>For Those Who Thought I was just Goofing Off In New Orleans</title><summary type='text'>AFCC Annual Meeting, New Orleans Saturday, May 30, 2009, 9:15 am (now available for download)"You Signed WHAT?"Mental health professionals have an ethical obligation to provide an “informed consent” process to the families they serve and attorneys are obligated to advise parents and protect their rights. This includes reviewing consent forms presented bymental health professionals. This </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/for-those-who-thought-i-was-just.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4228670015393076419'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4228670015393076419'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/06/for-those-who-thought-i-was-just.html' title='For Those Who Thought I was just Goofing Off In New Orleans'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2724255839937544803</id><published>2009-05-21T11:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-21T14:30:52.153-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='courts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='court budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domestic violence'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California state budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Now They're Chopping Down The Totem Pole We're the Low Guy On...</title><summary type='text'>In the wake of the vote-down of the Governor's various last-ditch "budget-rescue" bills, the Los Angeles Superior Court has announced that they will be closing all courtrooms one Wednesday per month, commencing in July, and continuing for the next fiscal year.This is, in a word, not likely to improve the functioning of the family court system, and not likely to make it more responsive to the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/05/now-theyre-chopping-down-totem-pole.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2724255839937544803'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2724255839937544803'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/05/now-theyre-chopping-down-totem-pole.html' title='Now They&apos;re Chopping Down The Totem Pole We&apos;re the Low Guy On...'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8171372358977407616</id><published>2009-05-01T12:03:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-01T12:40:01.880-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='same-sex marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><title type='text'>A new month, some big pieces pending, and some miscellaneous</title><summary type='text'>Pardon the twenty-day hiatus; had to get through tax season, and some business issues.  I also started but didn't finish a couple of long pieces, which will yet see the light of day here, having to do with what needs to be done, by government, lawyers, and YOU, readers, the public, to salvage a usable family law system from the rapidly unraveling social safety net.       On that "note", a pair of</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-month-some-big-pieces-pending-and.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8171372358977407616'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8171372358977407616'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-month-some-big-pieces-pending-and.html' title='A new month, some big pieces pending, and some miscellaneous'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5785946124953463412</id><published>2009-04-10T11:45:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-10T11:52:39.736-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><title type='text'>Chief Justice, Georgia Supreme Court, Says We Need to Combat Divorce The Way We Discourage Smoking</title><summary type='text'>Georgia Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears (a divorcee)  said "As a mechanism for signaling to young people the right time and the right person with whom to have a baby, marriage has no peer. . .. . . Marriage is also the best child welfare, crime prevention and anti-poverty program we have. We must, therefore, protect it."The good Justice did not elaborate on how she proposes to do this, though I'm </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/chief-justice-georgia-supreme-court.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5785946124953463412'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5785946124953463412'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/chief-justice-georgia-supreme-court.html' title='Chief Justice, Georgia Supreme Court, Says We Need to Combat Divorce The Way We Discourage Smoking'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1180024437745008741</id><published>2009-04-10T11:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-10T11:19:15.165-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children and law'/><title type='text'>Canadian Appeal Regarding Dad's Grounding 12-Year-Old Daughter</title><summary type='text'>Actually, the end result of high-conflict parenting. Volokh Conspiracy has a link to the original opinion in French, a rough translation into English, and comments including  my own two cents worth.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/canadian-appeal-regarding-dads.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1180024437745008741'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1180024437745008741'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/canadian-appeal-regarding-dads.html' title='Canadian Appeal Regarding Dad&apos;s Grounding 12-Year-Old Daughter'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1931215038092834678</id><published>2009-04-07T14:51:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-07T15:02:41.153-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Vermont'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='same-sex marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domestic partnership'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Washington D.C.'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><title type='text'>Same-Sex Marriage: The Dominoes Falling?</title><summary type='text'>In the wake of the Iowa's Supreme Court's ruling, noted below, two somewhat less surprising developments:In Vermont, the state legislature overrode a veto by the governor of that state's same-sex-marriage legislation;andin Washington D.C. , the Council, the city's governing body, has voted to recognize same-sex marriages contracted in other states and countries.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/same-sex-marriage-dominoes-falling.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1931215038092834678'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1931215038092834678'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/same-sex-marriage-dominoes-falling.html' title='Same-Sex Marriage: The Dominoes Falling?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-347027250260269589</id><published>2009-04-03T09:30:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-04T10:53:52.251-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='same-sex marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Iowa'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><title type='text'>Iowa Supreme Court Finds Limitation of Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Unconstitutional</title><summary type='text'>. . . or at least, under the Iowa Constitution.  Those who thought that this idea was confined to the "loony Left Coast": here's the opinion, care of, and thanks to, Howard Bashman's "How Appealing".Also, perhaps less surprisingly, Sweden has now legalized same-sex marriage.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/iowa-supreme-court-finds-limitation-of.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/347027250260269589'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/347027250260269589'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/iowa-supreme-court-finds-limitation-of.html' title='Iowa Supreme Court Finds Limitation of Marriage to Opposite-Sex Couples Unconstitutional'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4953769136185727686</id><published>2009-04-01T13:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-04-01T15:14:23.050-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='spousal support'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='recession'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='alimony'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child support'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='economy'/><title type='text'>After the Love Is Gone, After The Pink Slip Arrives...</title><summary type='text'>      All over the country, as the employment picture becomes gloomier, folks all over who were previously ordered, or agreed to pay moderate amounts of child and spousal support, based on their previous moderate earnings, are going back to court to modify those orders, because they no longer have the moderate earnings to pay from.  As with the down-turn in  economy generally, the phenomenon, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/economy-recession-and-support-orders.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4953769136185727686'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4953769136185727686'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/04/economy-recession-and-support-orders.html' title='After the Love Is Gone, After The Pink Slip Arrives...'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1643713412019476181</id><published>2009-03-24T16:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-12-11T11:01:12.779-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='immigration'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='illegal alien'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international child abduction'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>Child's Immigration Status Does Not  =  "Wrongful Retention" in the U.S.;  9th Circuit Speaks</title><summary type='text'>The 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has reversed a Federal trial court and denied an petition under  the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction for return of the child to Mexico, pending an actual custody determination. Said the progressive (or, depending on who you talk to, "notoriously liberal") Court, in an opinion by Justice Reinhardt:  [W]e must decide here </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/childs-immigration-status-does-not.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1643713412019476181'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1643713412019476181'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/childs-immigration-status-does-not.html' title='Child&apos;s Immigration Status Does Not  =  &quot;Wrongful Retention&quot; in the U.S.;  9th Circuit Speaks'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2769478556416810256</id><published>2009-03-23T11:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-23T11:21:42.536-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Islam'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sharia'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Egypt'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Egyptian Fatwa:  Your Neighbors Can Make You Get Divorced</title><summary type='text'>It seems that under a recent determination of Muslim law as it applies in Egypt, if a couple doesn't get along, but doesn't proceed to get a divorce, the neighbors can do it for them."Sheik Gamal Qutb, former head of Egypt's top religious institution, the Fatwa Committee at al-Azhar, said Sunday during a meeting at the Egyptian Press Syndicate that his fatwa states that neighbors and family </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/egyptian-fatwa-your-neighbors-can-make.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2769478556416810256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2769478556416810256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/egyptian-fatwa-your-neighbors-can-make.html' title='Egyptian Fatwa:  Your Neighbors Can Make You Get Divorced'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4583787353765635811</id><published>2009-03-20T12:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-23T09:51:28.730-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce settlement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Einstein'/><title type='text'>Possibly History's Coolest Divorce Settlement Offer</title><summary type='text'>Per the books-on-disc version of Walter Issacson's biography of Albert Einstein, when Einstein became estranged from his wife, he proposed to her that in exchange for her consenting to a divorce, when he won the Nobel Prize, he would give her the prize money.  He eventually did both.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/possibly-historys-coolest-divorce.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4583787353765635811'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4583787353765635811'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/possibly-historys-coolest-divorce.html' title='Possibly History&apos;s Coolest Divorce Settlement Offer'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-429773589486966482</id><published>2009-03-18T10:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-19T14:42:11.474-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='no-fault divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='adultery'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='New York divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='fault'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>How Bad Is "Egregious" (As Opposed To Just Plain "Really Bad")?</title><summary type='text'>New York, among other idiosyncracies in their family law, continues to have "fault divorce"; if you fail to prove fault, the court can refuse to grant a divorce. I've been practicing my entire career in a "no-fault" state, and the idea that the state has some interest in telling someone who wants to get divorced, "No, even though you've filed a divorce, you must stay married..." strikes me as </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-bad-is-egregious.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/429773589486966482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/429773589486966482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/how-bad-is-egregious.html' title='How Bad Is &quot;Egregious&quot; (As Opposed To Just Plain &quot;Really Bad&quot;)?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1335527336864737187</id><published>2009-03-16T16:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T16:49:17.927-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='interstate divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='interstate child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='international divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Divorce Across The Border, or Madness Across The Water</title><summary type='text'>As the world economy (or the world's economies) slumps*, different aspects of law come into sharp focus, while others, momentarily, lose relevance making them worthy of attention.  I'm now far more interested than I've been in a couple of decades, in the possible remedies my clients' refinance mortgage-holders may have when the mortgage doesn't get paid**.  The formulas by which the parties get </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/divorce-across-border-or-madness-across.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1335527336864737187'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1335527336864737187'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/divorce-across-border-or-madness-across.html' title='Divorce Across The Border, or Madness Across The Water'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-8904747833951053042</id><published>2009-03-13T14:38:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-16T15:17:08.078-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='name changes'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><title type='text'>Naming Your Children: Just Because You Have The Right to Do Something , Doesn't Always Make It a Good Idea...</title><summary type='text'>It appears that at least for the moment, the New Jersey court will not be restoring  full custody of little Adolf Hitler Campbell, and his siblings, Joyce Lynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell  (there's  some reason to think that ol' Honszlynn's middle name was supposed to be "Himmler") to their parents. These would be the parents who put their children into the public </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/naming-your-children-just-because-you.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8904747833951053042'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/8904747833951053042'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/naming-your-children-just-because-you.html' title='Naming Your Children: Just Because You Have The Right to Do Something , Doesn&apos;t Always Make It a Good Idea...'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-7790039314251697620</id><published>2009-03-11T16:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T10:12:13.437-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='White House'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child care'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Obama'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child support'/><title type='text'>The President Has a Family Law Agenda</title><summary type='text'>and it's on the White House agenda website.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/president-has-family-law-agenda.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7790039314251697620'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/7790039314251697620'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/president-has-family-law-agenda.html' title='The President Has a Family Law Agenda'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-6439704140185360602</id><published>2009-03-05T12:05:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-05T15:13:06.510-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce lawyer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>Do Fries Go With That  Divorce?</title><summary type='text'>A New York City firm is advertising that, if you drag your spouse into their offices, they'll prepare all the documents for an uncontested  (no kids/no property disputes/no support claims) divorce, for a bargain price, and give you a certificate so you can go have lunch at McDonald's while you wait the hour for the papers to be prepared.I await the "Divorce three, the next one's free!" card.  </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/do-fries-go-with-that-divorce.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6439704140185360602'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/6439704140185360602'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/do-fries-go-with-that-divorce.html' title='Do Fries Go With That  Divorce?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1211916749744363660</id><published>2009-03-05T11:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T10:13:29.890-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child support'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='paternity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Child Support in California: Never "Locked In"</title><summary type='text'>A California appeals court has now come a step closer to saying that parents simply can't ever make  a binding agreement to "lock in" an amount of child support, regardless of changes in parents' fortunes.  As long as everyone agrees that an amount of support is correct, there's no problem, but as soon as someone has a change of heart an agreement that child support can never be modified downward</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/child-support-in-california-never.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1211916749744363660'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1211916749744363660'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/03/child-support-in-california-never.html' title='Child Support in California: Never &quot;Locked In&quot;'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-2199168596160565613</id><published>2009-02-25T11:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T10:22:13.720-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='celebrity divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='assisted reproduction'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='octuplets'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='paternity'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California child custody'/><title type='text'>The Parenting Debate, times eight (or fourteen)</title><summary type='text'>OK, although I've got an opinion about the woman with the IVF octuplets, plus six other kids (as does everyone else, apparently) I'm keeping it to myself.   I'm not only not going to call any government agencies to "report Mom to the authorities", I won't debate about what "Octo-Mom" *  should or shouldn't have done.   I will talk, or at least raise annoying questions, about why this set of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/parenting-debate-times-eight-or.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2199168596160565613'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/2199168596160565613'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/parenting-debate-times-eight-or.html' title='The Parenting Debate, times eight (or fourteen)'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4366061732955682225</id><published>2009-02-20T10:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-12T10:26:04.118-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='wedding'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California prenuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-marital'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='pre-nuptial'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce lawyer'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>A Cup of Coffee On The Way, Pt. II:  Why Is Getting Married Easier Than Joining a Health Club?</title><summary type='text'>     When I was younger, and even more cynical, I once joked that the best way to reduce the divorce rate was to make it a lot more difficult to get married.      It's not as funny as I used to think it was.    When you buy a house, or even a car, you get a stack of many pages full of tiny type, which you are expected to read.  Some really important paragraphs are in BOLD TYPE, with lines for you</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/cup-of-coffee-on-way-pt-ii-why-is.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4366061732955682225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4366061732955682225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/cup-of-coffee-on-way-pt-ii-why-is.html' title='A Cup of Coffee On The Way, Pt. II:  Why Is Getting Married Easier Than Joining a Health Club?'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1017504771754259258</id><published>2009-02-18T14:42:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-27T16:36:56.531-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='murder'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domestic abuse'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='domestic violence'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>The sort of story that makes me want to practice admiralty law...</title><summary type='text'>She filed for divorce; a week later, the police say, he decapitated her.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/sort-of-story-that-makes-me-want-to.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1017504771754259258'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1017504771754259258'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/sort-of-story-that-makes-me-want-to.html' title='The sort of story that makes me want to practice admiralty law...'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-1856124618584607193</id><published>2009-02-16T15:29:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-27T16:38:14.302-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Richard Gould-Saltman'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='child custody'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='court budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California state budget'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>Sorry, Folks, You'll Just Have To Stay Married...  Pt. I.</title><summary type='text'>As the State Legislature finishes up a three-day weekend of not-entirely-successful budget negotiation, I'll be interested to see if just possibly, those who are taking a "no new taxes, ever!" stand really want to bring some of the operations of civil government to a grinding halt, or at least are willing to try and play an increasingly ugly game of "chicken".The civil justice system in </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/sorry-folks-youll-just-have-to-stay.html#comment-form' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1856124618584607193'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/1856124618584607193'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/sorry-folks-youll-just-have-to-stay.html' title='Sorry, Folks, You&apos;ll Just Have To Stay Married...  Pt. I.'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-5543588214852215384</id><published>2009-02-11T17:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-12T17:58:23.191-08:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='prenuptial agreement'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><title type='text'>Have a cup of coffee on the way: marriage and conversation</title><summary type='text'>When I was a young research clerk at L A Superior Court (1979 or so)  the court where I worked, (the Supervising Judge's Department for all of Los Angeles County's family court departments) was on the second floor  in the Hill Street courthouse. In those days the County Clerk's marriage license bureau was still on the first floor; there was even a duty "wedding commissioner" to perform weddings </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-cup-of-coffee-on-way-marriage-and.html#comment-form' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5543588214852215384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/5543588214852215384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/have-cup-of-coffee-on-way-marriage-and.html' title='Have a cup of coffee on the way: marriage and conversation'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3967426829790578059.post-4521274726276154848</id><published>2009-02-10T15:59:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-04-03T09:40:08.898-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='divorce'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='courts'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='same-sex marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='parenting'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Los Angeles family law'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='children'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='gay marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='marriage'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='California divorce'/><title type='text'>Off and Running (at the mouth)</title><summary type='text'>Herewith will begin all the news, thoughts, rumination and ranting about:California family law, family law, and why we have it;law in general in this man's United States, and pretty much anything else which crosses my radar     that you choose to read.Some of the axes which will be ground, and idees about which I may be fixe * will likely include:Why do people get married?  Why do they think </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4521274726276154848'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3967426829790578059/posts/default/4521274726276154848'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://familylawguy.blogspot.com/2009/02/off-and-running-at-mouth.html' title='Off and Running (at the mouth)'/><author><name>Richard Gould-Saltman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04962050153663635164</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
